We are starting to enter into a new normal. Restrictions are lifted and we are beginning to decrease social distance yet we must continue to care for those at risk. Until accurate testing is available, herd immunity is achieved, self-awareness and communication is our best tool. COVID CARE is a model in which we can each understand our own and our communities’ needs and risks and clearly communicate with others. By being honest and respecting others we can co-create a healthier expansiveness.
Covid CARE calls in four specific elements to consider and discuss with others as you start broadening your social circles:
Container, Agreements, Risk Tolerance and Etiquette.
Self-awareness is the first fundamental step in communication. We need to be honest with ourselves about our needs, desires and actions, then take responsibility for how those decisions affect others. This can be done intentionally and honestly, with clear communication.
Powerful changes to create a new normal can be achieved through communication, disclosure, and self-awareness. We can learn how to do this in order to strengthen and support one another and our community.
What will be our “new normal”?
There are those who are taking physical distancing very seriously, and those who feel anger and frustration at being told what to do by our Government. Our current political climate is fragmenting us further. We are impacted by the economic damages brought on by the closing of the economy, isolation from friends and family, and fear of sickness and death.
These stories and feelings can either tear us apart or bring us together. It will be our choice to make: Will our new normal be one based on scarcity and fear or on an abundance of hope and love? Finding that point where the freedom of the individual is balanced with care for others is key. It is here, I believe, that we can create a new world where we can all be seen and cared for equally, regardless of privilege.
We can all work towards a new normal that can be better than the one we left behind through thoughtful and clear communication. This is a moment in history where we can integrate ourselves back into society as supportive rather than oppressive.
COVID CARE provides us a model in which to move forward.
A Word about Shame and Judgement
These are trying times. We are scared. Some of us are facing death and illness like never before in our lives. Shame is a powerful tool used to maintain conformity to a social standard. It works. It also causes death, depression, isolation, and deep suffering far greater than any virus ever could. Being judgmental about others’ choices shuts people down from being honest. Not knowing what someone is doing during the age of Coronavirus is potentially deadly. It is far better to know if someone is not following measures to reduce viral transmission, so that you can protect yourself, than to shame and judge them to where they don’t disclose that to anyone else (while not changing their behavior). Listening to their reasons and having an open discussion is far more effective to have them care about their choices.
Container: Who is in your current social circle?
The Container includes the people who are in your household, living space, work space, or whom you might interact with without social distancing or precautions. Some other terms used are circle, cohort, contact circle, COVID pod, COVID-bonded, germacule, droplet bonded,and primary community. I chose the word CONTAINER, specifically because we are trying to “contain” the infection transmissions rate.
You could have a primary container — those that you share space with — and a secondary container, such as work spaces or visitors who have their own primary residences or containers. Those with bigger containers have bigger risks of infections associated with them.
Your container can have people at different social distances and include people who are in multiple containers. It should include the people who you directly intersect with: anyone who comes within 6 feet of you for more than 10 minutes. As time goes on, these containers may change, with people moving away or closer. Every shift requires new agreements from all in the primary container.
Many people know who is in their container, and feel safe within those choices, but many people do not have that privilege. Essential/front line workers, incarcerated, houseless and people in detention, have no say or ability to protect themselves from viral transmission. We have a social responsibility to them to understand our ability to make choices and continue to account for this when we begin to open up our container to others.
Who is in our container? What are their risks? How does our choice to engage with others affect them? Where does our container exist? A person living in New York City may feel very differently than someone living in rural Oregon.
The challenge is being able to communicate this to others. While it may seem like a hassle, drawing out your contacts can be a visual way to show others. This way, others can better make a decision knowing who is who and what they are willing to enter.
You can create your own Container diagram here to share with others.
Agreements: What agreements that you have with the people in your current container?
We often take people that we live with for granted. Maybe we have not clearly sat down and spoken our boundaries and risk reduction etiquette out loud, but have a common understanding of each other while we are in the place of “stay at home” measures. As we move towards broadening our containers, we need to create agreements with each other to help navigate these changes.
Everyone needs to understand and be clear about their needs and risks with everyone else within their container. Usually the highest risk person or the person with the lowest risk tolerance will set the standards of acceptable behavior for the container. Adding more people increases risks to everyone, so having clear agreements will be critical to everyone proceeding with caution and care.
Agreements may have allowances for those not at the same level. For example, if one person in the container socializes with others at less than 6 feet, the other members of the container may wish to stay more than 6 feet from them, and ask for extra cleaning of shared spaces or wearing of masks when near each other.
In some containers, it is difficult to have perfect risk reduction behaviors, such as maintaining 6 foot distance from strangers, wearing masks, or staying at home. For example families with essential/ frontline workers, teenage children or special needs people. In these situations, disclosure about the additional risks to others must be made as one broadens the social network. This is not about getting an infection that can easily be treated with an antibiotic, but something that can kill someone even with two degrees of separation.
Risk tolerance: What is your tolerance for risk for yourself and what are you putting onto others?
This is the most controversial and difficult place to navigate as we reduce social distancing and open society back up. We each have our own personal tolerance for illness, disease and death. It is imperative that we understand this in order to take into account everyone else in our container and community at large. This is why physical distancing is called for right now. It is the most effective means to reduce the spread of this virus. Yet, I cannot foresee a world where we no longer go to church, get our hair cut or see our friends and lovers. Humans are social creatures and connection to others is fundamental to life itself. Forsaking joy, love, pleasure and others for the period of time until herd immunity is reached will cause inordinate suffering.
Why consider risk tolerance and not just risks themselves?
Risk tolerance can dictate the behaviors we impart unconsciously to others. Risk tolerance is subjective and easily justified. We each form our risk tolerance based on our perceived personal and societal risks and benefits. We assume that everyone is on the same page (ours) or should be. We get angry and feel betrayed if they are not. Low or high risk tolerance does not make one better or worse, but with COVID-19, the need to be clear and conscious with one’s choices are imperative.
I use a backpack as a metaphor to explain the concept of risk tolerance: the more equipment (risks and precautions) you carry, the slower you move (lower tolerance), but the more likely you are to survive if you get lost in the woods (get infected). The less you carry, the faster you move (high tolerance) but the more likely you will be in need if you get lost.
People living in a high rise building in New York City will have a different risk tolerance than people in a farm community in rural Oregon. The more someone is at risk of disease and death due to where they live, their health, pre-existing conditions, economic status, race, or age, the lower their risk tolerance. Others feel that they have less to lose if they get sick, and are willing to take on more risks. One cannot know everyone’s level of vulnerability who we come in contact with. Essential workers and those they care for have died due to others’ inadvertent exposure.
Your personal risk tolerance is yours alone and cannot be imposed on anyone else without their clear verbal understanding and agreement. As risk tolerance increases, so does the potential harm to others. You are responsible for protecting others from yourself, otherwise that is a consent and boundary violation.
Understanding risk tolerance and being responsible for your choices is critical to our ability to open up our society as safely as possible.
As we open up our social containers to others, decreasing physical distance, not only risk tolerance should be clearly discussed but so should individual risk factors of all members. The person with the lowest risk tolerance and highest risk, must set the bar, without guilt or manipulation. If there are inconsistencies with this, then etiquette needs to be discussed and agreements made.
The following scale is not inclusive of all situations and is just a guide for defining one’s own risk tolerance level. Circumstances such as being an essential worker or one’s job, may make it difficult to be in the category that one wishes to be in. People may straddle different categories or move between them due to jobs, members in their containers, and results of available tests. There is no judgement implied in this; stricter levels of risk tolerance are not inherently “better” or “worse” than less strict levels. The intent here is to create a common vocabulary so we can communicate where we each stand.
0: Very Strict — Have been in very strict isolation alone or with others in a container, which may include the following:
Stays exclusively within the container/household.
6 feet apart with others within the household/container.
Strict etiquette including hand washing, masks and social distancing are used 100% of the time within the container.
Groceries delivered and wiped down.
No one outside is allowed in.
Infection control protocols outside of the bedroom. Bleach or sanitizing all surfaces touched by more than one person, no shared bathroom spaces.
People in this category are most likely to be at the highest risk of death from contracting the disease or caring for those that are. They may be on chemotherapy, immunosuppressives, elderly, pre-existing medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, etc), people of color, etc.
Their risks of sickness can interfere with their quality of life. Areas of high density of people, such as a city, may need this level of tolerance for the foreseeable future, until adequate testing and contact tracing is readily available. People in this category may have a lot of fear, value social responsibility towards others, and/or want to flatten the curve. Wanting to get through this pandemic without illness to self or others is a strong priority.
1: Strict — Have been in strict isolation alone or with others in a container, which may include the following:
Does not optionally leave the house/container except to get groceries and go to work.
No social distancing with members of one’s container.
Strict etiquette including hand washing, masks and social distancing are used 100% of the time when outside of the container.
Groceries delivered and/or wiped down before being allowed into the container.
No visitors are brought inside the container.
Person to person connection is done virtually or across a wide berth >6 ft + masks.
For some, while they may want to be at this level, they cannot due to their societal, economic, and/or personal situation. Essential workers may be strict when they are able to make those decisions but their work puts them at higher risk, so their risk tolerance is higher than their desire.
2: Fairly Strict — Have been in fairly strict isolation alone or with others in a container, which may include the following:
Leaves the house to go to work, where etiquette to reduce transmission is not strictly available.
Fairly strict etiquette including hand washing, masks, and social distancing are used 80-100% of the time when outside of the container.
Minimizes grocery and other shopping (once a week or less).
Brief outdoor exercise in low density areas.
May socialize with others outside of the container, at 6 ft apart or less than 6 ft with masks.
No sexual activity with anyone outside of the container. (Sexual activity is any behavior where sexual touch is exchanged.)
No one in the container has prolonged (more than 10 minutes) exposure with those outside the container.
People in this category may need more social exchange with others but still want to reduce the risks of infection as much as possible. Other circumstances, such as needing to continue work or take care of someone outside of the primary container, may require this level of risk tolerance.
3: Somewhat Open — Have chosen to be somewhat open with their container alone or with others, which may include the following:
Leaves the container to exercise, go to the store, work and other activities several times a week.
Etiquette including hand washing, masks and social distancing are used about 80% of the time when outside of the container.
Sometimes socializes with others who are not in one’s container
Maintains social distance
Less than 10 people
No more than twice a week.
Sometimes socializes with others at less than a 6 foot distance if they have been following fairly strict or somewhat open protocols as well.
May engage in sexual activity with others only if they have also have similar risk tolerance, with consent. Sexual activity is limited to no exchange of bodily fluids including open mouth kissing and oral sex.
People in this category may be found in places with lower Covid infections.
Those who have lower risk of death and disease to themselves, and do not share space with others at high risk, may be in this category.
4: Moderately Open — Have chosen to be moderately open with their container alone or with others, which may include the following:
Leaves the container to exercise, go to the store, work, and other activities multiple times a week.
Etiquette including hand washing, masks and social distancing are used around 40-60% of the time when outside of the container.
Regularly socializes others who are not in one’s container
May not maintain social distance
More than 10 people
No regard to how often one socializes.
May engage in sexual activity with others only if they have also have similar risk tolerance, with consent. Sexual activity can include exchange of bodily fluids including open mouth kissing and oral sex.
People here may believe they have no risk factors, or do not believe they know anyone who is at risk if they get the infection, or may be wanting to get infected.
They may have already been infected, tested positive for antibodies, and feel sure that they are no longer a vector for infecting others. Please note, that at the time of this writing, we do not know whether having antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 imparts immunity.
5: Very Open
Leave the container to exercise, go to the store, work and other activities multiple times a week with no precautions that have been shown to reduce viral transmission.
Etiquette including hand washing, masks and social distancing are used about 0-40% of the time when outside of the container.